Ethnic Diversity

The 2017 survey of ethnic minorities in associate and partner positions

Firms

White
partners
%

White
associates
%

Black/
African
partners
%

Black/
African
associates
%

Hispanic/
Latin
partners
%

Hispanic/
Latin
associates
%

Asian
partners
%

Asian
associates
%

Mixed/
Other
partners
%

Mixed/
Other
associates
%

Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C.

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Akin Gump

86.9

72.7

2.2

3.3

3.7

2.8

6.72

8.9

0.4

1.9

Allen & Overy LLP

89.8

70.7

U

2.3

0

4.1

10.2

13.4

0

2.3

Alston & Bird LLP

92.2

71.1

2.5

8

1.1

6

3.1

9.5

1.1

5.4

Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer

89.1

76.8

2.2

5.2

1.9

4.2

5.3

11.0

1.6

2.9

Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP

100

61

0

3

0

0

0

30

0

6

Baker Botts LLP

76.9

91.1

2.1

2.4

4.6

2.4

11.8

3.1

4.6

1

Baker McKenzie

88.4

73

0.6

5

4

4

5

14

2

4

Bracewell LLP

92

83

3

3

3

5

1

3

0

3

Brown Rudnick LLP

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Brownstein Hyatt

94

85

2

4

0

1

2

4

2

6

Cadwalader

90.1

71.9

1.4

4.1

2.8

4.1

4.2

15.2

1.4

4.6

Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP

91

79

3

3

0

6

4.5

12

1.5

0

Choate Hall & Stewart LLP

97

84

1.5

1

1.5

8

0

7

0

0

Cleary Gottlieb

89

64.1

2.8

9

3.7

8.8

3.7

13.3

0.9

4.7

Clifford Chance US LLP

82

64

0

2

4

9

3

17

11

8

Cooley LLP

87.4

75.6

1.4

3.1

2.9

2.7

6.9

12.9

1.1

4.5

Cozen O'Connor

93

84

2.5

3

2.5

4

1

5

1

4

Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP

93

75

1

4

1

4

5

13

0

4

Crowell & Moring LLP

90

67

4

9

2

5

4

17

1

2

Curtis, Mallet-Prevost

81

71

3.5

3

12

14.5

1.75

10

1.75

1.5

Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP

88

67

1

5

4

5

7

21

0

2

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

89.6

65.8

0.9

7.5

3.8

8.8

4.7

15.7

0.9

2.2

Dechert LLP

92

75.4

2.4

3.3

2.8

3.8

2.4

15.5

0.5

2

DLA Piper LLP (US)

86.5

73.4

2.2

4.1

2.7

1.8

4.8

14.6

1.7

5.8

Duane Morris LLP

90.5

80.6

2.5

3.1

2.5

3.7

4.5

6.2

1.7

3.7

Dykema Gossett PLLC

90

80

3

7

5

5

1

4

1

3

Epstein Becker & Green PC

88

82

1

4

2

1

6

10

3

3

Finnegan

88

66

3

6

0

3

9

24

0

1

Fish & Richardson PC

87

69

1

5

2

2

8

21

2

2

Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto

92

74

0

1.5

0

1.5

6

18

2

5

Foley & Lardner LLP

91.9

74.4

0.7

4.4

4

6.6

2.9

13.3

0

0

Fox Rothschild LLP

93.7

81.4

1.1

3.3

1.3

3.7

2.3

7.9

1.7

3.7

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP

92

77

3

4

5

8

0

11

0

0

Fried, Frank

97

76

0

6

1

4

2

10

0

4

Gibbons P.C.

92

94

3

1

3

5

2

0

0

0

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

89.9

76.6

1.6

2.3

1.3

4.2

6

13.5

1.3

3.4

Goodwin

93

76

1

4

2

3

3

14

1

3

Goulston & Storrs

99

75

0

9

0

7

1

9

0

0

Greenberg Traurig, PA

87.8

77.1

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Hangley

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Harris, Wiltshire & Grannis LLP

83

61

3

8

U

U

7

31

7

U

Haynes and Boone, LLP

88

69

1

4

6

7

4

17

1

3

Hogan Lovells

90

73

1

6

4

7

3

11

0.5

4

Holland & Knight LLP

88

74

2

6

7

11

2

7

1

2

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

91

69

1

11

3

8

4

9

1

3

Hunton & Williams LLP

90.8

82.8

2.8

3

3.2

5

2.8

6.9

0.4

2.3

Irell & Manella LLP

82

82

2

0

2

0

14

13

0

5

Jackson Walker LLP

86

73

3.5

7

7

9

2.5

7

1

4

Jenner & Block LLP

90.9

79

2.1

3.4

2.5

4.9

3

9.8

1.7

2.9

Jones Day

89.7

79.5

1.8

3.1

4.6

6.2

3

8.9

 

 

K&L Gates

89

83

2

3

2

3

5

7

2

4

Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP

87.8

80.8

1.1

7.2

6.7

4.8

1.1

3.2

3.3

4

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

93.2

80.2

1.4

4

1.1

4

3.9

11

0.4

0.9

Kilpatrick Townsend

92

73.2

2.5

5.5

0.8

3.2

4.6

13.6

0

4.6

King & Spalding LLP

91

82.3

2.4

4.8

3

4.2

3.3

6.3

0.3

2.5

Kirkland & Ellis LLP

88.6

76.8

1.5

2.4

3

5.5

5.7

13.2

1.3

2.1

Kramer Levin

91.9

77.9

2

1.2

0

4.7

6.1

13.4

0

2.9

Latham & Watkins LLP

92

81

1

4

3

6

6

15

1

1

Linklaters

86

59

2

2

5

6

2

7

7

6

Mayer Brown LLP

90.8

75

1.2

3

3.7

4

2.7

13

1.7

5

McDermott Will & Emery LLP

82.9

61.4

1.7

4

2.5

4.5

6.8

9.5

0.01

1.8

Milbank

88.4

70.4

1.8

5

5.4

7.6

3.6

12.9

0.9

4.1

Mintz Levin

91

79

2

5

3

3

4

11

0

2

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

91.9

75.6

1.7

4.2

1.1

4.2

4.8

13.5

0.5

2.4

Morrison & Foerster LLP

83.7

68.2

2.4

3.2

4

5.3

10

19.1

0

4.2

Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP

82.4

74

0

4.2

3.5

5.2

11.8

11.5

0

6.3

Nixon Peabody LLP

90.4

74.6

1.5

5.4

2.5

5.4

4

10.7

1.5

4

Norton Rose Fulbright

91.8

73.1

1

4.8

3.4

4.9

3.4

12.9

0.3

4.3

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

97

81

U

7.5

3

4

U

7.5

0

0

O'Melveny & Myers LLP

89.4

75.8

2.1

1.9

0.5

5.3

8

14.4

0

2.6

Orrick

78.5

59.6

2.8

2.5

1.7

4.8

8

14.4

9

18.7

Patterson Belknap

90

75

2

2

2

3

6

12.5

2

7.5

Paul Hastings LLP

88.7

65.7

2.9

3.7

3.3

3.7

4.9

23.3

0.4

3.7

Paul, Weiss

87

78

3

5

2

2

7

12

2

3

Perkins Coie LLP

88

75

2

3

3

5

4

13

3

4

Pillsbury

87

67.8

1.2

3.4

2.7

4.2

7.6

20.8

0.9

2.5

Proskauer Rose LLP

93.2

76.8

2.3

2.3

2.7

4.8

2.3

13.6

0

2.5

Reed Smith LLP

88.6

79.2

1.4

3.1

2.9

2.7

4.6

9.1

1.3

1.9

Ropes & Gray LLP

84

70

2

4

1

3

5

12

U

4

Schiff Hardin LLP

86.7

75

3.9

3.4

2.2

2.3

4.4

11.4

1.7

2.3

Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP

87

74

2

1

2

3

3

14

1

3

Sedgwick LLP

82

74

4

3

7

16

2

13

4

3

Seward & Kissel LLP

93

83.5

U

2.9

1.8

1.9

5.3

10.7

0

1

Shearman & Sterling LLP

90

68

3

5

2

5

6

19

0

2

Sheppard, Mullin

89

61

2

4

2

5

4

15

3

15

Sidley Austin LLP

89.2

72.1

1.7

4.3

1.7

6.4

6.5

14.9

0.9

2.3

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP

90

72

2

3

3

3

5

17

0

5

Skadden

92.1

70.7

1.4

5.9

3.1

5.4

3.4

13.5

0

4.5

Snell & Wilmer LLP

91

86

U

1

4

3

1

6

3

2

Squire Patton Boggs

85.6

79.4

4.4

2.3

3.6

5.1

5.2

10.1

1.2

3.1

Sterne, Kessler

77.8

72.9

3.7

2.9

5.6

1.4

13

22.9

0

0

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP

93

77

U

5

3.5

7

3.5

7

0

4

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP

91

76

2

3

4

4

3

14

1

2

Thompson & Knight LLP

94

83

1

6

2

2

U

5

3

5

Vedder Price

92

78

1

6

3

3

4

10

U

3

Venable LLP

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

U

Vinson & Elkins LLP

90

79

1

4

4

4

2

9

3

2

Waller

97

86

1.2

6

0

1.2

1.8

7

0

0

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP

86

75

3

4

3

5

4

14

U

2

White & Case LLP

80

60

2

5

6

12

10

17

1

6

Wiley Rein LLP

89

73

3

8

3

5

5

13

0

1

Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP

92.1

75.7

1.4

4.4

2.9

5.9

2.1

10.4

1.4

3.6

WilmerHale

89

76.8

2.7

5.2

0.8

3

6.7

13.4

0.8

1.4

Wilson Sonsini

77.5

66.8

1.4

2.25

6.6

2.25

14

24.2

0.5

4.5

Winston & Strawn LLP

91

76

2

5

3

5

3

9

1

5